Obama’s Policies Lead Only to Pessimism among Business Leaders
By Jeremy Weltmer • Tuesday, August 3, 2010 9:37 am
There need no longer be any speculation about how businesses view the present economic climate. As Veronique de Rugy of the Mercatus Center has indicated,
“The above chart illustrates one of the greatest economic costs of the current recession: lack of businesses investment. Using data from the United States Federal Reserve Bank, Mercatus Center Senior Research Fellow Veronique de Rugy shows the changes in American businesses’ cash reserves since 1975. Billions of dollars in cash reserves is shown in red and cash reserves as a percentage of total business assets is shown in blue to provide historical parity. By both measures, companies are holding onto more cash than they have in 48 years, over $1.8 trillion.”
Historically, companies do whatever they can to optimize their return on capital, whether it be in terms of R&D, expansion, hiring, or acquisitions, yet in the present climate, they have chosen to sock away an unprecedented proportion of their revenue to protect against a rainy day. Now, one could chalk this up to an extremely dour outlook on the present economy, but the NFIB’s monthly survey of business leaders offers more insight.
As the recession has dragged on for almost three years now, “Economic Conditions” coming in as the most important indicator on the decision-making process regarding expansion should surprise no one. More importantly, whereas some disagreement exists among business leaders on every other issue, respondents resoundingly indicate that the Political Climate makes the present a bad time to expand.
Moreover, the chart of the “single most important problem” respondents currently face reveals even more.
As the Cato Institute indicates in its analysis, “thirty percent of respondents said their single most important problem is “Poor Sales.” “Taxes” and “Government Regulations and Red Tape” come in second and third place at 22 percent and 13 percent respectively. Combining the two, the biggest problem facing small businesses according to respondents is government. [In his recent op-ed about the survey, Paul] Krugman waves the government problem away by pointing out that taxes and regulations ranked higher in the 1990s when the economy was strong. However, he ignores the trend. Concern about taxes and regulations trended lower as the 1990s moved into the 2000s, but have been trending higher in the last couple of years,” just reaffirming the notion that the only thing that businesses have left to fear is government itself.
Between what business leaders are saying and what their business choices are showing, one can see that there is a clear cause to business’s reticence: a fear of government policy making it impossible for them to do business as they do now. Every American knows the effects of businesses hoarding cash instead of hiring, building, and investing. The rainy day for which they are saving is the tomorrow that the politics of today will produce, and no amount of government policy can cure business of the cost of regulation.
Comments (16)
Post Your Comment
If only you would realize how wrong-minded the whole republican tax affair is. You had your chance to "Improve the economy" when Bush was president. Where are all the jobs that his administration created? Does anyone of you read any history? Look up FDR and see the mistakes he made trying to heat the economy up after the war; Obama has ten times the intellectual capital as any of you fools. I am so angry about this BS that Grover Norquist same up with! How dare he? How dare he insinuate himself into political office? And, he isn't bright enough to get anything done without screwing up MY MONEY! You are all costing me money if you follow this damn fool path. Obama has done plenty to support our economy, and if you could only understand what's true and what isn't, you'd see that the stimulus helped a hell of a lot more than not doing anything! I'm just coming to see what complete idiots you people are, I thought you would come to grips with our president once you saw how well he is doing! I believe you are racist, because nothing would explain the complete stupidity you manifest by fighting him so. I am ashamed of you, fellow americans. Let your 401ks die, but you leave mine alone! Get the damn debt limit squared away, like you've done so many times before, without so much as a word of complaint, but NOW you're going to hold up all the progress we may have made, and cost this country their financial security? you can all go squarely and stupidly to hell.
>> Linda L. Weeks July 18, 2011 7:42 pm
IMHO you've got the right ansewr!
>> Lorene October 10, 2011 2:19 pm
d6no5a cqlepdgwoput
>> gmolmfcz October 11, 2011 10:40 am
qtppN4 , [url=http://lxmpcnzjelyb.com/]lxmpcnzjelyb[/url], [link=http://ehztynxjzxeh.com/]ehztynxjzxeh[/link], http://zblzvpmojrlv.com/
>> vrbbdgsez October 12, 2011 5:25 am
3une9G , [url=http://wwhjqfqhyrcy.com/]wwhjqfqhyrcy[/url], [link=http://avlhxicetxze.com/]avlhxicetxze[/link], http://irssmdrltkmk.com/
>> hwmrxftem October 15, 2011 9:01 am
Keynes) would generate far more weatlh than the value of the money used. If you don't require work and drop the money from helicopters, this again would supposedly create far more weatlh than the value of the money used.Our government would argue that we can do better than these silly examples. We can pay for projects and services, to get the value of those things and the extra weatlh creation from the effect of the spending multiplier.I point out that if you believe Keynes' idiocy, then printing counterfeit money is a lot cheaper and less disruptive to the economy than borrowing it and having to pay it back. Of course, the powerful Secret Service was created to eliminate and prosecute counterfeiting, so we know that government (properly) believes that spending money at random destroys weatlh rather than creates it. Counterfeiting is stealing.Spending is not stimulus. There is no stimulus. The multiplier is 1. When the government spends for things, that is what you have at the end, just those things. You have those things rather than the things that private, productive individuals would have bought or created.For more about Keynes, digging holes, and his false ideas about money, see
>> Chee August 30, 2012 10:14 am
hzMJdJ jctkgyrosjjt
>> lridmw August 31, 2012 3:09 am
RkHbaQ , [url=http://wyhekiedsepl.com/]wyhekiedsepl[/url], [link=http://xchterdyqgnc.com/]xchterdyqgnc[/link], http://sihatfsklwbb.com/
>> xymrinsxrl August 31, 2012 3:13 pm
98V13h mkrgpjltkdcm
>> gdipsj September 1, 2012 1:46 pm
Q6Q7Gw , [url=http://lbqdgmdfkcvn.com/]lbqdgmdfkcvn[/url], [link=http://fxstarlpzdps.com/]fxstarlpzdps[/link], http://dsuwfzngnrdc.com/
>> szhlfjs September 2, 2012 4:57 pm
I cannot tell a lie, that really hpleed.
>> Nano September 13, 2012 2:33 pm
Suprirsnig to think of something like that
>> Andrez September 15, 2012 1:52 am
uroqB4 pfhtrhxqpluh
>> jvpqhojf September 15, 2012 12:35 pm
HpeH0N , [url=http://eezxdqyegvre.com/]eezxdqyegvre[/url], [link=http://abalguhilwsq.com/]abalguhilwsq[/link], http://oshpuorprhps.com/
>> mvgcil September 16, 2012 12:35 pm
r2nyfi umrjmubqgjxw
>> jtpjpjzhcu September 18, 2012 6:24 am
frRLO7 , [url=http://lxovkvbzlrwp.com/]lxovkvbzlrwp[/url], [link=http://amkfqumirnvk.com/]amkfqumirnvk[/link], http://wfdmstjnknpr.com/
>> pxndxhxgs September 18, 2012 8:54 pm
Add a Comment